Sunday, June 16, 2013

Not a big surprise

NSA admits listening to U.S. phone calls without warrants

National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.

June 15, 2013 4:39 PM PDT




The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."   (Read the Rest below)

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57589495-38/nsa-admits-listening-to-u.s-phone-calls-without-warrants/

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

On NSA spying and who we are going to convict.

Congressman Peter King wants to prosecute the whistle blower.  That's a way to handle it.  Arrest and prosecute the messenger. 

Isn't it time to stop pointing fingers and start looking at ourselves and how much we are part or maybe the whole of the problem? I look at my Verizon bill and I can see all the phone calls made and to what number and length of time. The same thing with my internet house phone. My cable company knows what I watch and has access to what I DVR. Netflix tells me what I recently watched and makes fairly accurate predictions of what I might like to watch.. Amazon has my wish list and does the same as Netflix. I'm bombarded by spam. How did they get my email address? My internet provider knows what websites I go to even if I have a privacy setting. They know my banks. How far away is it that someone can crack my passwords? (It's easily done by those in the know BTW). I guess the difference is that the government who can easily access anything these days as major corporations do have a different POV for all this. They are looking for suspicious things and anyone associated with someone under suspicion becomes suspicious whether they do something wrong or not. Re: "National Security letters" for example. So we do have something to worry about, but pointing fingers at whistle blowers only makes it worse.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

The Banality of "Don't be Evil"

“THE New Digital Age” is a startlingly clear and provocative blueprint for technocratic imperialism, from two of its leading witch doctors, Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, who construct a new idiom for United States global power in the 21st century. This idiom reflects the ever closer union between the State Department and Silicon Valley, as personified by Mr. Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google, and Mr. Cohen, a former adviser to Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton who is now director of Google Ideas.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/opinion/sunday/the-banality-of-googles-dont-be-evil.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Boyhood



Boyhood is an attempt at climbing as high as the stars. And once forgotten one is still climbing. I am looking out at the street from my window through glass that ripples and has bubbles but is always clean. I have many friends, but I am always up before them watching the street for the first to emerge. I never am out first. On most Saturday mornings the sun glints against the windows on the other side of the street blanking them out and sometimes hurting my eyes.

On some mornings when it's raining the Astoria, Queens summer streets are steamy and bathed in purple light while streams run along the gutters with bits of paper racing to the sewers. Behind me through the open window in the bathroom I hear the water running down the drains and splashing into the courtyard and as the drops get slower I know when the rain is over.

I sometimes have to wait a long time for Billy K. I can't say his last name but I like the name "Billy K" because it reminds me of the cowboy, Billy the Kid. Billy K still is missing two teeth in front. Mine came in real early before I was seven. Billy and I go to the library a lot. I never went to a library before Billy K. I didn't know there was such a place. The first time I was there I was scared.

"They're going to give me books for free, Billy?"
"That's what they're supposed to do."
The way Billy said it, I was expecting to be called stupid or silly. But he never said anything to make me feel bad. Billy K was a quiet boy and mostly we sat on his stoop and looked at books or played Go fish or talked about the war that had past us almost before we were born as if we were old men who lived through it all. Billy did most of the talking especially about his father who was in the war, but who I never saw.

Still I didn't always play with Billy K and one day when I walked past him to go down the block to where Larry and Dennis lived, he looked up at me with those missing teeth showing and said, "Want to go to the library today?"
"No. Not today Billy. Today I'm playing a different game."
"With who?"
"You know Larry and Dennis?"
"I don't like them. They always pick on me." He said.
"They don't pick on me. They like me. Dennis showed me his father's Japanese rifle that he got during the war. We always play war." Billy smiled up at me, a knowing smile, and then looked down at the ground between his legs and I walked by.

One morning on my way to school I walked past Billy K's stoop hoping to see him come bounding down arms flapping and book bag by the handles. There was a truck opposite his stoop and a ramp touched the street from a door in its side like a great tongue. Two men were struggling up the ramp with a green plastic covered couch. Billy K was standing next to the stoop watching not dressed for school.

"You're going to school today, Billy?" I asked.
"No. Today I'm moving."
"So you're going tomorrow?"
"I don’t know, probably."
"Where are you moving to?"
"I don't really know. . . I think the Bronx."
"Where's that, around the corner?"
"It's around lots of corners far away, maybe as far as
Japan."
"That far? I won't see you then tomorrow?" I asked.
"Can you go to the Bronx?" he asked.
"The Bronx? I don't know. Yeah, maybe. I don't know. Can you come here?"
"I'll come if my mother lets me. I know this place pretty good." Billy said.
"Ok. Goodbye Billy, I have to go to school. I'll see you then. Maybe we can go to the library."
"Yeah, ok. Goodbye," he said. "I hope I see you some place."

I never saw Billy K again.

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Our Kind of Ridiculous: Yous, Me and Blackness as Probable Cause


When I was twenty-four, I flew paper airplanes past the apartment of a thirty-two-year-old white boy named Kurt in Emmaus, Pennsylvania. Kurt rocked a greasy brown mullet, bragged about ironing his bleached Lee's, and said the word "yous" a lot. Even with caked-up cornbread sealing the cracks of his teeth, and a raggedy mustache that looked like it was colored by a hyper six-year-old, Kurt always reminded me of somebody cute.
Kurt, whose apartment was directly above mine, lived with two women. One was his girlfriend. She could see. One was his wife. She could not.
Three little boys lived in the apartment with Kurt and his two partners. The youngest boy was Kurt's girlfriend's child. This miniature Viking loved to run his muddy hands through his blond hair and grin when he wasn't growling. The other two boys looked like they rolled around naked in a tub of melted tootsie rolls before coming outside to play.

http://gawker.com/5990859/our-kind-of-ridiculous-yous-me-and-blackness-as-probable-cause

Monday, February 25, 2013

Why is there a Pope?

Why is there a Pope? (No other major religion has the equivalent.) There's probably a ridiculously long explanation for this though you won't find it in the New Testament. Yes there is Matthew 16:18 but that passage doesn't say "Pope." And there is no absolute proof that Matthew, apostle and one-time tax collector, was the scribe of the first synoptic gospel but may have been written by an unknown non-observer.   I think the idea of such a church structure that has at its head a "ruler" who has the last word didn't come from the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth but is based on the political organization of the Roman Empire. 


Thursday, January 24, 2013

British scientists announce breakthrough in turning DNA into data storage



© AFP Photo
Scientists in Britain on Wednesday announced a breakthrough in the quest to turn DNA into a revolutionary form of data storage.

A speck of man-made DNA can hold mountains of data that can be freeze-dried, shipped and stored, potentially for thousands of years, they said.

The contents are "read" by sequencing the DNA - as is routinely done today, in genetic fingerprinting and so on - and turning it back into computer code.

"We already know that DNA is a robust way to store information because we can extract it from bones of woolly mammoths, which date back tens of thousands of years, and make sense of it," said Nick Goldman of the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) in Cambridge.

"It's also incredibly small, dense and does not need any power for storage, so shipping and keeping it is easy."

DNA is the famous double helix of compounds - a long, coiled molecular "ladder" comprising four chemical rungs, adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine, which team up in pairs. C teams up with G, and T teams up with A.

The letter sequence comprises the genome, or the chemical blueprint for making and sustaining life. Human DNA has more than three billion letters, coiled into packages of 24 chromosomes.

The project entails taking data in the form of zeros and 1s in computing's binary code, and transcribing it into "Base-3″ code, which uses zeros, 1s and 2s.

The data is transcribed for a second time into DNA code, which is based on the A, C, G and T. A block of five letters is used for a single binary digit.

The letters are then turned into molecules, using lab-dish chemicals.

The work does not entail using any living DNA, nor does it seek to create any life form and in fact the man-made code would be quite useless in anything biological, the researchers said.

"We have absolutely no intention of messing with life," said Goldman.

Only short strings of DNA can be made, which means the message has to be chopped up into small sections of 117 letters, each attached to a tiny address tag, rather like packet-switching in Internet data, which enables data to be reassembled.

To prove their concept, the team encoded an MP3 recording of Martin Luther King's "I Have A Dream" speech; a digital photo of their lab; a PDF of the landmark study in 1953 that described the structure of DNA; a file of all of Shakespeare's sonnets; and a document that describes the data storage technique.

"We downloaded the files from the Web and used them to synthesise hundreds of thousands of pieces of DNA. The result looks like a tiny piece of dust," said Emily Leproust of Agilent, a US biotech company that took the digital data and used it to synthesise molecules of DNA in the lab.

Agilent then mailed the sample back across the Atlantic to the EBI, where the researchers soaked the DNA in water to reconstitute it and used standard sequencing machines to unravel the code. They recovered and read the files with 100-percent accuracy.

The work follows a big step last year when scientists at Harvard announced they had stored 700 terabytes of data - enough for around 70,000 movies - in a gram of DNA.

The new method eliminates the risk of error when the DNA is read, say the researchers, whose work appears in the journal Nature.

"We figured, let's break up the code into lots of overlapping fragments going in both directions, with indexing information showing where each fragment belongs in the overall code, and make a coding scheme that doesn't allow repeats," said co-author Ewan Birney.

"That way, you would have to have the same error on four different fragments for it to fail, and that would be very rare."

Data is accumulating massively around the world, and storing it is a headache. Magnetic and optical discs are voluminous, need to be kept in cool, dry conditions and are prone to decay.

"The only limit (for DNA storage) is the cost," said Birney.

Sequencing and reading the DNA takes a couple of weeks with present technology, so it is not suitable for jobs needing instant data retrieval.

Instead, it would be appropriate for data that would be stored for between 500 and 5,000 years, such as a doomsday encyclopaedia of knowledge and culture.

But on current trends, sequencing costs could fall by a factor of 20 within a decade, making DNA storage economically feasible for timeframes of less than 50 years, the authors claim.

Source: Agency France-Presse